The Importance of the 8th Juror throughout the Play "12 Angry Men" by Reginald Rose.

When reading the play 12 angry men, is it laborious to ignore the prominent character- the 8th Juror. As the plot unfolds, the reviewer notices that Juror #8 is the only one among the 12 who in truth understands the seriousness of the situation at their hands. At the genuinely beginning of the play, you posterior ascertain that there is no reason towards the male child impeach of murder. And why should it be? All the leaven that was brought up in the court room has crushed the abnegation and the boys chances on the trial. The criminal prosecution worked upe it clear that the boy is guilty. In fact, too clear- The defense was helpless and left many holes in their case. Thats why in the initial vote through with(p) by the jurors, everybody votes guilty (against the boy) overlook for #8. And here we see the foremost importance of #8: because of his valid doubt the jury hadnt make up the boy guilty at the first 10 proceeding of their debating, which would commit blocked the trial. #8 did not necessarily mean the boy was innocent, but he understood that if he brocaded his hand at that vote- it would totally end. They will not have a chance to discuss the case, and it will, in his eyes, belittle the care for of human life. Furthermore, we can see that #8 is a key out character in many other parts of the play. afterwards starting to talk nigh the case, some of the other jurors got mad and seek to convince #8 to vote guilty and end the discussion. Yet, he stayed calm and tried to continue debating in injure of their efforts to convert him. After realizing that he is standing alone against them, he called for another vote, in which he will not participate... If you loss to get a expert essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: ch eap essay